It can not be more than hearing about Berlusconi, his way of being and doing. You can not even admit it is considered an excellent communicator, think like a good merchant. Decide: or a merchant, and in this capacity is dedicated to the market, or is a communicator, and in this case he should be given space on television, as it happens. Quite rightly, I might add, since it is worthy of such a role, because we recognize the great communicative power, compared to those in the same role in an unworthy manner, not even able to communicate. "But he wants to remove freedom of expression," the objection. This, I say, not about communication, but the political advantage of his institutional position as to affect the right to information. The problem, therefore, is political. E 'policy that must be fought with political struggle, wise and honest, of who is neither deaf nor television communication, but it is political. E 'policy that leads the fight, with the tools of politics, and not the beats that would be satire, but honestly disgusted and do not change nothing, but they increase the role and powers of the great communicator, who does not mind either the plan of irony. So the struggle is political. Means to fight the opposition of a different model than the one proposed by Berlusconi. Who should make this contrast? Politicians, of course, that model is opposite to that proposed by Berlusconi. What should these other politicians? Well, they should have attitudes, words, wisdom and honesty than those that are not recognizable in Berlusconi. And 'no point in talking about these politicians go on television, first because they are communicators, and then speak more than wrong, and secondly they should be engaged in life with actions of great value, a reflection of their spirit high. The highest action they should do, saying a great sense of civil and political honesty, is to reduce the salaries of MPs. Not that I affect their salaries, personally, but would be a great political action, a great contrast, it would also be a great demonstration of pure men and great sensitivity to themselves and to ordinary citizens. Should these politicians, left, tell me so well, do what is not done from the right, and this distinguishes them much to Berlusconi, beyond words. If these are not resolved, I'm sure the great communicator also beat them in this test of honesty. "Di Michele Santoro What do you think?" I was told by an acquaintance. "It 's just that he is on television with his way of doing?" The simple answer is: Yes, I will give the explanation again. In conclusion, those who want to be left on the side and in the service of the weak, vulnerable people to become closer to the action. Words and intentions are not enough for those who feel politically different from Berlusconi. The items are to individuals who have not chosen the profession of politics, but the only honesty can give is that of words and heart, and with this in silence, are also some practical works of charity towards those who have less resources them, even though their resources are not huge, Sponsoring a child, for example, or extending a coin into the hand of a poor man on the street asks him something because he is hungry. Some might say that many politicians have adopted children. Sure, I say, but this work of charity to allow the cleaner who has a heart for this kind of emotion. Do not rob us of even that small chance. Their chances must aim to be an example for an entire population, giving up riches that are disproportionate to the rest of the people. Folks, it's a nice term, studies Vico to understand the beauty and value.
